Writting/Computer
Evaluation of Ethical Issues Associated with Formulating Global Cybersecurity Policy
Each student evaluates the issues associated with Botnets and with formulating global cybersecurity policy through a 10 page (minimum length) position paper. If you have any questions, please ask them early in the week so you have enough time to complete this assignment on time.
Students are to discuss the characteristics of Botnets:
-
- Discuss Six specific characteristics of global Botnets (such as purpose, size, attack method, attribution, etc.), and describe how these characteristics have emerged, changed, or evolved over the past 5-10 years. Also describe the key technical features of six example Botnets
. - Discuss briefly what contributing factors may cause Botnet characteristics to change, and how these characteristics may change over the next ten years.
- How might these future Botnets be countered by global cybersecurity POLICY controls (do not describe technology controls) in the future?
- Discuss Six specific characteristics of global Botnets (such as purpose, size, attack method, attribution, etc.), and describe how these characteristics have emerged, changed, or evolved over the past 5-10 years. Also describe the key technical features of six example Botnets
Discuss policy, security practices, ethical principles, and recommendations. Support your ideas by using examples and cited references.
Prepare your paper in either Word or PDF format in APA format. The citations and the reference list in the paper should be formatted in accordance with APA 6th edition guidelines. References are NOT included in the page count.
Before you submit your paper, you will need to run your assignment through Turnitin.com and receive an originality report
Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent A (90+) |
Satisfactory B (80-89) |
Needs Improvement (below 80) |
|
Content (80%) |
|||
|
Clarity of discussion of botnet cybersecurity issues (16) |
Thorough discussion of the global issues associated with formulating global botnet cyber security policies with examples. |
Adequate discussion the global issues associated with formulating global botnet cyber security policy. |
Discussion of the global issues associated with formulating global botnet cyber security policy are neither adequately discussed nor clearly stated. |
|
Clarity of discussion of botnet characteristics (16) |
Thorough discussion of the characteristics of botnets with examples.. |
The discussion of the characteristics of botnets is adequate. |
The discussion of the characteristics of botnets is incomplete. |
|
Compelling arguments regarding global botnet cyber security policy. (16) |
Author takes a compelling position that is thoroughly developed and logically presented regarding global botnet cyber security policy |
Author takes a position that is sufficiently developed and logically presented regarding global botnet cyber security policy |
Author takes no position regarding global botnet cyber security policy or takes a position that is not sufficiently developed and/or not logically presented regarding global botnet cyber security policy. |
|
Compelling arguments regarding factors that will facilitate global botnet cyber security policy success and collaboration. (16) |
Author presents and defends a comprehensive position regarding factors that will facilitate success and collaboration relative to global botnet cyber security policy. The position is thoroughly developed and logically presented |
Author takes an adequate position regarding factors that will facilitate success and collaboration relative to global botnet cyber security policy. The position is adequately developed and presented |
Author takes poor or no position regarding factors that will facilitate success and collaboration relative to global botnet cyber security policy. The position is poorly developed and not logically presented |
|
Quality of documented support(16) |
The discussion in the paper is based on a thorough review of the literature and includes resources available through the UMUC library. |
The discussion in the paper is based on an adequate review of the literature. |
The scope of the research presented in the paper is inadequate. Heavy reliance on reference material (e.g. Wikipedia, exam prep books, “Dummies” guides). |
|
Form (20%) |
|||
|
Organization (8) |
The content is well organized with clear transitions among major subtopics. |
The content is generally well organized with some improvement possible in transitions among subtopics. |
The organization of the content is confusing without clear transitions among subtopics. |
|
Writing style(8) |
Graduate-level writing is reflected throughout the paper, including accurate spelling, punctuation, grammar, and sentence structure. |
Writing is acceptable, with a few errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and/or sentence structure. |
Writing does not meet graduate standards. Unacceptable number of errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar and/or sentence structure. |
|
Use of proper APA formatting (4) |
In-text citations are in proper APA format and all sources are identified in the reference list and cited in proper APA format. |
Minor errors in citation identification and/or APA format. |
Unacceptable number of errors in citation identification and/or APA format. |
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
